• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Naval Historical Society of Australia

Preserving Australia's Naval History

  • Events
  • Account
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us
  • Show Search
  • 0 items
Hide Search
Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Where to start
      • Research – We can help!
      • Self help
      • Naval Service Records
      • Library
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Resources
      • Articles
      • Videos
      • On This Day
      • Podcasts
      • Australian Military Ship Losses
      • RAN events on a  Google Earth Map
      • RAN Vessels – Where are they now?
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Other
      • Newsletters: Call The Hands
      • Occasional Papers and Historical Booklets
      • Books
      • HMAS Shropshire
      • Book reviews
    • Close
  • Naval Heritage Sites
    • World Heritage Listings
      • Cockatoo Island
    • National Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Sydney II and the HSK Kormoran Shipwreck Sites
      • HMVS Cerberus
    • Commonwealth Heritage Listings
      • Garden Island NSW
      • HMAS Watson
      • HMAS Penguin
      • Spectacle Island Explosives Complex NSW
      • Chowder Bay Naval Facilities
      • Beecroft Peninsula NSW
      • Admiralty House, Garden and Fortifications
      • HMAS Cerberus
      • Naval Offices QLD
      • Garden Island WA
      • Royal Australian Naval College ACT
      • Royal Australian Naval Transmitting Station ACT
    • NSW Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Rushcutter
    • Close
  • Naval Art
  • Tours & Cruises
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, East
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, West
    • Anniversary Cruise: Sydney under Japanese Attack
    • Tour Bookings
    • Close
  • About us
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • Our People
      • Office Bearers
      • Become a volunteer
      • Our Goals and Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Victoria Chapter
      • WA Chapter
      • ACT Chapter
    • Close
  • Membership
  • Shop
  • Become a volunteer
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Article topics / Publications / Naval Historical Review / HMAS Sydney – A Tale of Two Warships

HMAS Sydney – A Tale of Two Warships

Sullivan, John · Sep 11, 1991 · Print This Page

Author
Sullivan, John
Subjects
WWII operations, WWI operations
Tags
Bartolomeo Colleoni, ESPERO, GIOVANNI DELLA BANDE NERE, EMDEN, Kormoran
RAN Ships
HMAS Sydney I, HMAS Sydney II
Publication
September 1991 edition of the Naval Historical Review (all rights reserved)

SYDNEY had been registering hits on the enemy for some time, mostly on COLLEONI, which was the nearer of the two targets. Eventually COLLEONI was stopped, and her crew began to abandon her. She had not suffered a great deal of damage on the upper deck, but SYDNEY’s shells had penetrated the thin hull and caused havoc internally. Leaving two of the destroyers to sink her with torpedoes, SYDNEY chased after BANDE NERE and scored more hits, but the Italian had the legs of SYDNEY, even with her freshly cleaned bottom, and she succeeded in getting away. Collins abandoned the chase at 1037, with great reluctance, after having been ordered to return to Alexandria. In any case, he was nearly out of 6″ ammunition. As a result of this action, coupled with an earlier Fleet action at Calabria, the Italian surface forces remained in harbour for a long time to come.

Now we come to the final scene. We return to the Indian Ocean, but considerably closer to Australia than the action between SYDNEY (1) and EMDEN. The German merchant raider KORMORAN was originally the Hamburg-Amerika Line’s STEIERMARK of 8,736 tons, and she had been requisitioned as she completed her builder’s trials. She was fitted with 6 x 5.9″ guns, of which four constituted a broadside, as well as anti-aircraft and close-range weapons, and six torpedo tubes. She carried two seaplanes, but as she had no catapult these had to be launched overside by crane. This was difficult to do in anything other than a flat calm, and consequently they were seldom used. She also carried approximately 360 mines. She was commissioned into the German Navy in October 1940, under the command of Korvettenkapitan Theodor Detmers. She sailed on 3rd December, 1940, disguised as the Russian VYACHESLA MOLOTOV and commenced operations in the Atlantic, where she sank or captured eight ships. On 1st May, 1941, she passed into the Indian Ocean, where she apparently adopted the disguise of the Dutch STRAAT MALAKKA and later a Japanese ship. Detmers picked off three more victims in the Indian Ocean. The last of these was a small unarmed Greek steamer which was sunk on 25th September. Several times KORMORAN intended to lay some of her mines, but in the event she never laid any at all.

SYDNEY, now commanded by Captain Joseph Burnett, left Fremantle on 11th November, 1941, escorting the troopship ZEALANDIA on her way to Singapore. She handed ZEALANDIA over to HMS DURBAN in Sunda Strait, when she signalled her expected return to Fremantle as 20th November. That was the last that was seen or heard of SYDNEY, except by KORMORAN. The only information available came from survivors of KORMORAN. On 19th November the two ships made contact and in the ensuing battle SYDNEY sank KORMORAN, but in so doing she received very heavy damage herself. Did she blow up as a result of the raging fires aboard? Many of the statements from KORMORAN survivors are contradictory, or to say the least, hard to believe.

This article is not the place to discuss the various controversial issues which are associated with SYDNEY’s loss. If the answers are ever to be known, it will have to be soon. There can’t be too many of KORMORAN’s survivors who are still alive, and they alone can tell what really happened. Why were there no survivors from SYDNEY? When HOOD blew up there were only three survivors rescued, but there were probably many others who escaped the explosion only to perish in the icy Arctic waters. There were many more survivors from BARHAM when she blew up in the much warmer Mediterranean, and it could be expected that this would be the case in the Indian Ocean.

It is suggested that a study of Michael Montgomery’s book, “Who Sank the SYDNEY?“, might be worthwhile. This book is certainly controversial, but it does not – cannot – give answers to the many problems involved in the sinking of SYDNEY.

Barbara Winters’ “HMAS SYDNEY – Fact, Fantasy and Fraud” is also well worth studying.

Hopefully this article has brought back many memories to our older readers, and whetted the appetites of the younger ones for a better understanding of naval history.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Naval Historical Review, WWII operations, WWI operations Bartolomeo Colleoni, ESPERO, GIOVANNI DELLA BANDE NERE, EMDEN, Kormoran

Primary Sidebar

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up for our monthly e-newsletter.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

Latest Podcasts

  • The Fall of Singapore
  • HMAS Armidale
  • Napoleon, the Royal Navy and Me
  • The Case of the Unknown Sailor
  • Night of the midget subs — Sydney under attack

Links to other podcasts

Australian Naval History Podcasts
This podcast series examines Australia’s Naval history, featuring a variety of naval history experts from the Naval Studies Group and elsewhere.
Produced by the Naval Studies Group in conjunction with the Submarine Institute of Australia, the Australian Naval Institute, Naval Historical Society and the RAN Seapower Centre

Life on the Line Podcasts
Life on the Line tracks down Australian war veterans and records their stories.
These recordings can be accessed through Apple iTunes or for Android users, Stitcher.

Video Links

  • Australian War Memorial YouTube channel
  • Royal Australian Navy YouTube Channel
  • Research – We can help!
  • Naval Heritage Sites
  • Explore Naval Art
  • Dockyard Heritage Tour
  • About us
  • Shop
  • Events
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Members Area
  • Privacy Policy

Naval Historical Society of Australia Inc. Copyright © 2025