• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Naval Historical Society of Australia

Preserving Australia's Naval History

  • Events
  • Account
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us
  • Show Search
  • 0 items
Hide Search
Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Where to start
      • Research – We can help!
      • Self help
      • Naval Service Records
      • Library
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Resources
      • Articles
      • Videos
      • On This Day
      • Podcasts
      • Australian Military Ship Losses
      • RAN events on a  Google Earth Map
      • RAN Vessels – Where are they now?
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Other
      • Newsletters: Call The Hands
      • Occasional Papers and Historical Booklets
      • Books
      • HMAS Shropshire
      • Book reviews
    • Close
  • Naval Heritage Sites
    • World Heritage Listings
      • Cockatoo Island
    • National Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Sydney II and the HSK Kormoran Shipwreck Sites
      • HMVS Cerberus
    • Commonwealth Heritage Listings
      • Garden Island NSW
      • HMAS Watson
      • HMAS Penguin
      • Spectacle Island Explosives Complex NSW
      • Chowder Bay Naval Facilities
      • Beecroft Peninsula NSW
      • Admiralty House, Garden and Fortifications
      • HMAS Cerberus
      • Naval Offices QLD
      • Garden Island WA
      • Royal Australian Naval College ACT
      • Royal Australian Naval Transmitting Station ACT
    • NSW Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Rushcutter
    • Close
  • Naval Art
  • Tours & Cruises
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, East
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, West
    • Anniversary Cruise: Sydney under Japanese Attack
    • Tour Bookings
    • Close
  • About us
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • Our People
      • Office Bearers
      • Become a volunteer
      • Our Goals and Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Victoria Chapter
      • WA Chapter
      • ACT Chapter
    • Close
  • Membership
  • Shop
  • Become a volunteer
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Article topics / Publications / Naval Historical Review / HMAS Sydney Inquiry (Letter No. 1)

HMAS Sydney Inquiry (Letter No. 1)

Nicholson, Ian · Jun 20, 2000 · Print This Page

Author
Nicholson, Ian
Subjects
WWII operations, Letter to the Editor
Tags
Kormoran
RAN Ships
HMAS Sydney II
Publication
June 2000 edition of the Naval Historical Review (all rights reserved)

Earlier correspondence from a member concerning an important point of ship recognition vis-a-vis Kormoran and Straat Malakka deserves response. He queries how the Dutch merchantman with a distinctive counter stern could be confused with the Kormoran and her cruiser type stern.

Circumstances at the time of the Sydney-Kormoran engagement were not so clear cut. With the raider heading into the western sun as the cruiser approached from astern it would have been difficult for the keenest observer on the latter’s bridge to make out such features clearly until the German was almost abeam and silhouetted. By that time the challenge had presumably been answered – correctly!

Besides Sydney’s latest description of Raider 41 (Kormoran) was probably the Admiralty report in which the stern was said to be somewhat between a half counter and a half cruiser type! Another point for clarification and likely explanation is the report by Detmers and others that Sydney when closing in was preparing to lower a boat (a German engineer said she actually lowered a boat but he probably did not observe this himself being in the machinery spaces and it is likely that he misunderstood his Captain’s report or someone else).

Following the usual practice Sydney would have had a seaboat permanently turned out on its davits and plainly visible to the German crew. With the reported preparations for the Walrus aircraft flight the boat would have been manned as “crash-boat” in case of emergency during aircraft operations. The Walrus flight was evidently cancelled when Sydney became satisfied with Kormoran’s false identity. The boat’s crew would then have been fallen out and action stations relaxed. After that the routine seaboat’s crew of the watch would have manned the boat temporarily to be mustered and check on the boat rope, lashed tiller and plug, etc. Once reported to the OOW this crew would also have fallen out on deck. Thus it is easy to see why the Germans, closely watching their foe’s approach, thought that the boat was being prepared for lowering – when there was no apparent reason for same and no further mention of the boat.

 

Naval Historical Review, WWII operations, Letter to the Editor Kormoran

Primary Sidebar

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up for our monthly e-newsletter.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

Latest Podcasts

  • The Fall of Singapore
  • HMAS Armidale
  • Napoleon, the Royal Navy and Me
  • The Case of the Unknown Sailor
  • Night of the midget subs — Sydney under attack

Links to other podcasts

Australian Naval History Podcasts
This podcast series examines Australia’s Naval history, featuring a variety of naval history experts from the Naval Studies Group and elsewhere.
Produced by the Naval Studies Group in conjunction with the Submarine Institute of Australia, the Australian Naval Institute, Naval Historical Society and the RAN Seapower Centre

Life on the Line Podcasts
Life on the Line tracks down Australian war veterans and records their stories.
These recordings can be accessed through Apple iTunes or for Android users, Stitcher.

Video Links

  • Australian War Memorial YouTube channel
  • Royal Australian Navy YouTube Channel
  • Research – We can help!
  • Naval Heritage Sites
  • Explore Naval Art
  • Dockyard Heritage Tour
  • About us
  • Shop
  • Events
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Members Area
  • Privacy Policy

Naval Historical Society of Australia Inc. Copyright © 2025