• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Naval Historical Society of Australia

Preserving Australia's Naval History

  • Events
  • Account
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us
  • Show Search
  • 0 items
Hide Search
Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Where to start
      • Research – We can help!
      • Self help
      • Naval Service Records
      • Library
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Resources
      • Articles
      • Videos
      • On This Day
      • Podcasts
      • Australian Military Ship Losses
      • RAN events on a  Google Earth Map
      • RAN Vessels – Where are they now?
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Other
      • Newsletters: Call The Hands
      • Occasional Papers and Historical Booklets
      • Books
      • HMAS Shropshire
      • Book reviews
    • Close
  • Naval Heritage Sites
    • World Heritage Listings
      • Cockatoo Island
    • National Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Sydney II and the HSK Kormoran Shipwreck Sites
      • HMVS Cerberus
    • Commonwealth Heritage Listings
      • Garden Island NSW
      • HMAS Watson
      • HMAS Penguin
      • Spectacle Island Explosives Complex NSW
      • Chowder Bay Naval Facilities
      • Beecroft Peninsula NSW
      • Admiralty House, Garden and Fortifications
      • HMAS Cerberus
      • Naval Offices QLD
      • Garden Island WA
      • Royal Australian Naval College ACT
      • Royal Australian Naval Transmitting Station ACT
    • NSW Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Rushcutter
    • Close
  • Naval Art
  • Tours & Cruises
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, East
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, West
    • Anniversary Cruise: Sydney under Japanese Attack
    • Tour Bookings
    • Close
  • About us
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • Our People
      • Office Bearers
      • Become a volunteer
      • Our Goals and Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Victoria Chapter
      • WA Chapter
      • ACT Chapter
    • Close
  • Membership
  • Shop
  • Become a volunteer
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Article topics / Publications / Naval Historical Review / The chase and sinking of the ‘Bismarck’

The chase and sinking of the ‘Bismarck’

Patterson, W.R, Captain, RN · Mar 1, 2000 · Print This Page

Author
Patterson, W.R, Captain, RN
Subjects
WWII operations
Tags
Ship sinking, HMS Hood, HMS King George V, Bismarck, HMS Rodney
RAN Ships
None noted.
Publication
March 2000 edition of the Naval Historical Review (all rights reserved)

The Commander-in-Chief, having received information that the Bismarck had put to sea, made suitable disposition of the forces at his disposal and sailed in HMS King George V, accompanied by other units, on the evening of Thursday, the 22nd May.

On Friday afternoon, we passed a large homeward-bound convoy. It was such a convoy as this that the enemy wished to find; had he been able to do so, the loss of valuable ships and cargoes and the even more valuable lives of the seamen would have been immense.

That evening the news arrived that the Norfolk and Suffolk had sighted the enemy ships Bismarck and Prince Eugen in the Denmark Straits. All that night, skirting the edges of the ice, in varying visibility and amidst frequent snow-storms, the two cruisers continued to shadow the enemy. It was most fitting that these two cruisers by this work should be able to repay the enemy for the bombs so frequently dropped on East Anglia.

During this night, the King George V and the other units steamed at 27 knots to intercept the enemy at the earliest opportunity. Early on Saturday (24th May) an enemy report was made by HMS Hood and we knew that she and the Prince of Wales would soon be in action. At this moment our feeling of satisfaction that our heavy ships had made contact was spoilt by the probability that the Bismarck might be destroyed or turned back without the King George V having a hand in the matter. Ever since the Prime Minister had spoken to us at Rosyth we had all looked on the Bismarck as our own particular target.

All too soon the tragic news arrived that the Hood had been blown up by an unlucky hit. The loss of this fine old ship and her gallant crew was a sad blow to us all.

The Prince of Wales also received damage from several hits and her speed reduced, but not before she and Hood had scored hits on the Bismarck; this was one of the reasons which later caused the enemy to change his plans.

The Bismarck and Princ Eugen continued their flight to the southward, shadowed continually by the Norfolk and Suffolk, supported by the Prince of Wales.At eight o’clock that evening (Saturday, 24th May) HMS King George V was in a position 450 miles south-west of Reykjavik; the enemy was to the west-ward; distance 180 miles, and it was hoped we should bring him to action early in the forenoon of the 25th.

During the whole chase the time kept on board was British Summer time, i.e. two hours ahead of Greenwich Mean Time. As we were now in 30° West, sunset on the 24th did not take place until 0031 on the 25th, and dawn broke at 0600. The Captain’s order book on that night said:

“Course 2120, speed 27 knots. Call me in accordance with standing instructions. Pass enemy reports down the voicepipe as they come in. Call me at once if cruisers lose touch with enemy and at 0530. 14″ turrets to close up at 0200. “

During the first watch, the Commander-in-Chief detached Victorious to carry out a torpedo bomber attack on the enemy. The attack was delivered with great gallantry and pressed home under heavy fire, and the enemy was hit by one torpedo. The enemy was further damaged and about this time must have made up his mind to return.

In the middle watch, in the dark and in the rain squalls, the enemy eluded our cruisers, who had for some thirty-six hours given a classic example of shadowing under the most difficult conditions, which will rank with that of the Gloucester in 1914.

Our disappointment at not meeting the enemy during the forenoon could only have been surpassed by that in the cruisers and Prince of Wales, who had been doing such magnificent work for such a long period.

The Commander-in-Chief immediately took the necessary steps to dispose his forces to meet the various possible movements of the enemy.

We, wherever we may be, in the engine-room, the switchboards, a turret or on the Compass Platform, working in comparative monotony, rarely realise the responsibility and burden which rest on one man’s shoulders, or the team work which is necessary, and which the whole of this operation so well showed, between the Commander-in-Chief afloat and the Admiralty at Whitehall.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2 Page 3

Naval Historical Review, WWII operations Ship sinking, HMS Hood, HMS King George V, Bismarck, HMS Rodney

Primary Sidebar

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up for our monthly e-newsletter.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

Latest Podcasts

  • The Fall of Singapore
  • HMAS Armidale
  • Napoleon, the Royal Navy and Me
  • The Case of the Unknown Sailor
  • Night of the midget subs — Sydney under attack

Links to other podcasts

Australian Naval History Podcasts
This podcast series examines Australia’s Naval history, featuring a variety of naval history experts from the Naval Studies Group and elsewhere.
Produced by the Naval Studies Group in conjunction with the Submarine Institute of Australia, the Australian Naval Institute, Naval Historical Society and the RAN Seapower Centre

Life on the Line Podcasts
Life on the Line tracks down Australian war veterans and records their stories.
These recordings can be accessed through Apple iTunes or for Android users, Stitcher.

Video Links

  • Australian War Memorial YouTube channel
  • Royal Australian Navy YouTube Channel
  • Research – We can help!
  • Naval Heritage Sites
  • Explore Naval Art
  • Dockyard Heritage Tour
  • About us
  • Shop
  • Events
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Members Area
  • Privacy Policy

Naval Historical Society of Australia Inc. Copyright © 2025