• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Naval Historical Society of Australia

Preserving Australia's Naval History

  • Events
  • Account
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us
  • Show Search
  • 0 items
Hide Search
Menu
  • Home
  • Research
    • Where to start
      • Research – We can help!
      • Self help
      • Naval Service Records
      • Library
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Resources
      • Articles
      • Videos
      • On This Day
      • Podcasts
      • Australian Military Ship Losses
      • RAN events on a  Google Earth Map
      • RAN Vessels – Where are they now?
      • Related Maritime websites
    • Other
      • Newsletters: Call The Hands
      • Occasional Papers and Historical Booklets
      • Books
      • HMAS Shropshire
      • Book reviews
    • Close
  • Naval Heritage Sites
    • World Heritage Listings
      • Cockatoo Island
    • National Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Sydney II and the HSK Kormoran Shipwreck Sites
      • HMVS Cerberus
    • Commonwealth Heritage Listings
      • Garden Island NSW
      • HMAS Watson
      • HMAS Penguin
      • Spectacle Island Explosives Complex NSW
      • Chowder Bay Naval Facilities
      • Beecroft Peninsula NSW
      • Admiralty House, Garden and Fortifications
      • HMAS Cerberus
      • Naval Offices QLD
      • Garden Island WA
      • Royal Australian Naval College ACT
      • Royal Australian Naval Transmitting Station ACT
    • NSW Heritage Listings
      • HMAS Rushcutter
    • Close
  • Naval Art
  • Tours & Cruises
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, East
    • Navy in Sydney Harbour Cruise, West
    • Anniversary Cruise: Sydney under Japanese Attack
    • Tour Bookings
    • Close
  • About us
    • About Us
      • What we do
      • Our People
      • Office Bearers
      • Become a volunteer
      • Our Goals and Strategy
    • Organisation
      • Victoria Chapter
      • WA Chapter
      • ACT Chapter
    • Close
  • Membership
  • Shop
  • Become a volunteer
  • Donate
You are here: Home / Article topics / Publications / Naval Historical Review / Book Review: In the Wake

Book Review: In the Wake

Loosli, Geoffrey, Rear Admiral, RAN · Sep 1, 1999 · Print This Page

Author
Loosli, Geoffrey, Rear Admiral, RAN
Subjects
Ship histories and stories, Book reviews, Naval Engagements, Operations and Capabilities
Tags
Collision, USS Frank E Evans, Stevenson
RAN Ships
HMAS Melbourne II
Publication
September 1999 edition of the Naval Historical Review (all rights reserved)

Title: In The Wake Author: Jo Stevenson Publisher: Hale and Iremonger, Sydney.


HMAS Melbourne was involved in two collisions during her lifetime. In 1964 HMAS Voyager was cut in two and 82 lives were lost. In 1969 USS Frank E. Evans was cut in two and 74 lives lost. All bridge personnel in Voyager including the Captain and Officer of the Watch, were killed so that it will never be known why the ship was following the course which resulted in the collision. The subsequent Royal Commissions left few satisfied that the cause was established or that blame had been correctly apportioned. Shortly after the Commissions rendered their findings the Commanding Officer of Melbourne resigned from the Navy as he believed he had no future hope of promotion because of the posting he had received to a shore establishment normally held by a more junior officer than he.

In contrast, all bridge personnel of USS Frank E. Evans survived the collision including the Commanding Officer and Officer of the Watch and his assistant. Consequently the information to piece together the events leading up to the point of collision is known. The joint USN/RAN Board heard its evidence in Subic Bay in the Philippines and in concluding its report apportioned blame primarily to Frank E. Evans but found that Melbourne contributed to the collision.

The author of “In the Wake”, Jo Stevenson, sat throughout the hearing of the Joint Board and painstakingly took down the evidence as it was given. Her husband, Captain J.P. Stevenson, was the Commanding Officer of Melbourne and was subsequently court martialled. The verdict was no case to answer and he was honourably acquitted. Shortly after the verdict he resigned from the Navy because he had been posted to a shore establishment to a position normally held by an officer of lower rank.

The author’s first book on the events surrounding the collision – “No Case to Answer” – was published in 1971. The book now under review essentially repeats the first 12 Chapters of that book with minimal change as they deal with the circumstances of the collision as they emerged before the Joint Board. The next two chapters relate the events leading to the decision to court martial Captain Stevenson and the proceedings of the Court.

Chapter 15 onwards has been rewritten substantially and added to by new material and opinion which has become available since the first book was published. The final chapters throw more light on matters relating to the appointment of Captain Stevenson from Melbourne to the position of Chief of Staff to the Flag Officer in Charge East Australia Area and his refusal to accept it but instead submit his resignation. Further insight to the conduct of the joint USN/RAN Board of Inquiry comes from an article by Anthony Vincent. He was the lawyer dispatched by the Naval Board to the Inquiry at Subic Bay to assist all Australian naval witnesses with legal advice, to represent any one or more of the witnesses becoming “suspected” of having committed an offence, and to observe the proceedings generally. On the first day of the Inquiry he was informed he would not be allowed into the Court for any purpose unless one of the RAN witnesses became “suspect”. In the event none did and Vincent did not appear in the Court.

Vincent was suffering terminal cancer when he wrote the article. After his death his wife sought the assistance of the Honourable Gordon Samuels QC, now the Governor of New South Wales, to arrange the publication of the article in the Quadrant Magazine in 1975. Vincent must have been sorely troubled by his role in the Inquiry and, to set his mind at rest when so tragically ill, determined to set the record straight. He believed that the composition of the six-man Board was wrong in that the President, Rear Admiral King USN, was too closely associated with the Evans and that the Australian counsel assisting the Board, Commander Glass QC RANVR, was “trumped” by the USN upgrading his counterpart to the rank of captain and thereby demoting Glass to assistant counsel rather than joint counsel.

He was dismayed that he was not allowed into the courtroom and he prepared a long submission justifying his presence in Court, but found that the Naval Board did not support him in his belief that he was there in part to observe the proceedings and protect the interests of the RAN. He was extremely critical of the manner in which the Board conducted day to day proceedings, with the President dominating the questioning of witnesses after counsel had completed asking theirs on behalf of the Board. He noted that officers from Evans had been `suspected’ which gave them the option of answering questions whereas they could well have been a time during the proceedings when Stevenson would have been considered as such. This led to the somewhat ‘devious course’ of finding him negligent when compiling the final report without at some stage of the hearing warning him that he was `suspect’.

Pages: Page 1 Page 2

Naval Historical Review, Ship histories and stories, Book reviews, Royal Australian Navy, Naval Engagements, Operations and Capabilities Collision, USS Frank E Evans, Stevenson

Primary Sidebar

SUBSCRIBE

Sign up for our monthly e-newsletter.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Categories

Latest Podcasts

  • The Fall of Singapore
  • HMAS Armidale
  • Napoleon, the Royal Navy and Me
  • The Case of the Unknown Sailor
  • Night of the midget subs — Sydney under attack

Links to other podcasts

Australian Naval History Podcasts
This podcast series examines Australia’s Naval history, featuring a variety of naval history experts from the Naval Studies Group and elsewhere.
Produced by the Naval Studies Group in conjunction with the Submarine Institute of Australia, the Australian Naval Institute, Naval Historical Society and the RAN Seapower Centre

Life on the Line Podcasts
Life on the Line tracks down Australian war veterans and records their stories.
These recordings can be accessed through Apple iTunes or for Android users, Stitcher.

Video Links

  • Australian War Memorial YouTube channel
  • Royal Australian Navy YouTube Channel
  • Research – We can help!
  • Naval Heritage Sites
  • Explore Naval Art
  • Dockyard Heritage Tour
  • About us
  • Shop
  • Events
  • Members Area
  • Volunteer
  • Donate
  • Contact us

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • Members Area
  • Privacy Policy

Naval Historical Society of Australia Inc. Copyright © 2025